Methods · 11 bone-level measurements

Every bone-level measurementand how a photograph gives it.

The clinical versions of these need a calibrated lateral X-ray, a CT, or callipers on the face. A photograph gives their visible equivalents — silhouette angles, shading steps, directions and ratios of your own features — and that is what the report measures, scores and states the method for. Nothing is left out; nothing is invented in millimetres.

From your smile, ¾, profile and hairline photos: jaw definition and taper, cheek shading, nasal dorsum line, chin–lip direction, forehead slope, neckline, ear size and height, smile width, tooth and gum show, and your real facial thirds — each with a bucket and an error band.

MeasurementWhat Canthion reports, and howWhy the clinical number needs more than a photo
Gonial angle
bony
Jaw taper (soft-tissue angle from the jaw angle to the chin, levelled to your pupils) and jaw definition (the shadow step across the jaw line) from your ¾ views, plus jaw:cheek width from the front — each with an error bar and a grade. more →Gonion is a landmark on the mandibular BONE.
Ramus : mandibular body ratio
bony
Jaw taper and jaw:cheek width. The vertical ramus is hidden in any photo, so the ratio is not attempted; the two silhouette reads carry what it would tell you. more →The ratio requires condylion (the top of the mandibular condyle, inside the temporomandibular joint) — a point that is not externally visible at all — and gonion (see above).
Nasofrontal, nasofacial, nasolabial, mentolabial & cervicomental angles
lateral
Chin–lip direction (behind / level / ahead of the nose-tip→chin line), forehead slope and dorsum line from your profile — buckets with an error band rather than degrees to two decimals. more →These are lateral cephalometric measurements with clinical tolerances of ±1–2 mm / a few degrees.
Ricketts E-line, Steiner S-line, Holdaway H-line
lateral
Chin–lip direction from your profile: a direction and a share of the nose-tip→chin distance, with its ±. more →Lip-to-line distances with norms of a few millimetres (E-line: upper lip −4 ± 2 mm).
Orbital vector / infraorbital rim position
bony
Under-eye darkness (ΔL*), eye openness and canthal tilt — the parts of the orbit a photo can read — scored and placed on the masculinity axis. more →Defined in lateral view as the sagittal relationship of the cornea to the inferior orbital RIM — a bony structure.
Ogee curve score
invented
Cheek shading in the ¾ view (light on the cheekbone vs a flat mid-cheek) and midface width — the visible part of the curve. more →The ogee is a qualitative description of the S-shaped malar–submalar contour seen on a three-quarter view, used in custom-implant planning.
Golden ratio / Marquardt Phi mask fit
refuted
The measured optima instead of 1.618: Pallett's ratios (0.36 vertical, 0.46 horizontal), which are the values raters actually preferred — scored like every other proportion. more →Refuted with morphometric methods.
Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR)
refuted
Width:height with your hairline placed (auto-detected or from your hair-back photo), scored, plus a masculinity axis built from the traits that genuinely separate the sexes. more →As an individual-level trait indicator, discredited.
Chin projection vs a bony reference plane (zero meridian, etc.)
lateral
Chin–lip direction from the profile and chin share of the lower face from the front, with the masculinity read on the chin and the beard call that follows. more →Gonzalez-Ulloa's zero meridian drops a vertical from nasion with the head in Frankfort horizontal.
Fitzpatrick type / Individual Typology Angle from RGB
uncalibrated
Skin depth (L*), undertone, chroma and colour season from a white-balanced sample — described and used for your palette, not forced into a phototype. more →ITA requires calibrated CIE L*a*b* colorimetry under a known illuminant.
Any absolute measurement in millimetres
scale
Everything as ratios of your own features (iris width, inter-pupil distance, face height) — the only scale a single photo supports — and a score out of 100 on each. more →Scale is unrecoverable from a single uncalibrated 2D image.
And the score

Every proportion is scored on its distance from the optimum for your reference group and graded A–F; the overall score weights harmony, skin, leanness & definition and symmetry. The construction is printed on the report. Methodology · Start an analysis