Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR)
what a photo can give, and how we take it.
Width against height, with your hairline placed for you or taken from your hair-back photo, and scored. Alongside it, a masculinity axis built from the traits that genuinely separate the sexes.
Also searched as facial width to height ratio, high fWHR and fWHR meaning.
What we report
Width against height, with your hairline placed for you or taken from your hair-back photo, and scored. Alongside it, a masculinity axis built from the traits that genuinely separate the sexes.
Why not the clinical number itself
As an individual-level trait indicator, discredited. Kramer (2015) found no sexual dimorphism in fWHR across photographs, 3D scans and direct anthropometry. Kordsmeyer et al. (2022) showed that bizygomatic width alone is dimorphic once size is adjusted for: the ratio's denominator destroys the signal. Deaner et al. (2012): body weight, not fWHR, predicts aggression in hockey players. And a brow raise changes the number on its own.
Sources
- Kramer 2015, Evol Psychol — doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300112
- Kordsmeyer et al. 2022, Biol Lett — doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0211
Ratios of near-coplanar frontal distances, angles relative to the interpupillary line, and skin appearance. Each comes with an error bar, and each is placed against a population you choose. Start an analysis or read the methodology.
fWHR is one of the fourteen traits with a published sex difference; that page lists its direction and effect size alongside the other thirteen.
The others people ask for
Same question, different measurement: what the clinical version needs, and what a photograph can give instead.
What is measured instead
How every bone-level measurement is taken here · methodology · glossary · all 35 insight pages