Orbital vector / infraorbital rim position
what a photo can give, and how we take it.
The parts of the eye socket a photo can actually read: under-eye darkness (ΔL*), eye openness and canthal tilt. Each is scored and placed on the masculinity axis.
Also searched as negative orbital vector, positive orbital vector, under-eye support and infraorbital rim.
What we report
The parts of the eye socket a photo can actually read: under-eye darkness (ΔL*), eye openness and canthal tilt. Each is scored and placed on the masculinity axis.
Why not the clinical number itself
Defined in lateral view as the sagittal relationship of the cornea to the inferior orbital RIM. The rim is bone. A frontal photo cannot compute it at all, and a lateral photo gives only a soft-tissue proxy. Of everything consumer tools claim, this is the clearest example of a measurement they provably cannot make.
Ratios of near-coplanar frontal distances, angles relative to the interpupillary line, and skin appearance. Each comes with an error bar, and each is placed against a population you choose. Start an analysis or read the methodology.
The others people ask for
Same question, different measurement: what the clinical version needs, and what a photograph can give instead.
What is measured instead
How every bone-level measurement is taken here · methodology · glossary · all 35 insight pages