Chin projection vs a bony reference plane (zero meridian, etc.)
what a photo can give, and how we take it.
From the profile, which way the chin sits relative to the lips. From the front, how much of the lower face the chin takes up. The masculinity read on the chin and the beard call follow from those two.
Also searched as recessed chin, weak chin and chin projection.
What we report
From the profile, which way the chin sits relative to the lips. From the front, how much of the lower face the chin takes up. The masculinity read on the chin and the beard call follow from those two.
Why not the clinical number itself
Gonzalez-Ulloa's zero meridian drops a vertical from nasion with the head in Frankfort horizontal. It needs a lateral view, and it needs a reference plane that can be reproduced (FH varies ±4.6° between individuals). Around eight mutually inconsistent published methods for chin position exist: Goode, Merrifield, Silver, Legan, Burstone, Riedel, Steiner, Byrd. That there are eight of them is itself evidence that none is a ground truth.
Sources
- Ahmad & Rohrich 2014, Aesthet Surg J — origin of the zero meridian — doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14539974
Ratios of near-coplanar frontal distances, angles relative to the interpupillary line, and skin appearance. Each comes with an error bar, and each is placed against a population you choose. Start an analysis or read the methodology.
The others people ask for
Same question, different measurement: what the clinical version needs, and what a photograph can give instead.
What is measured instead
How every bone-level measurement is taken here · methodology · glossary · all 35 insight pages