Fitzpatrick type / Individual Typology Angle from RGB
what a photo can give, and how we take it.
Skin depth (L*), undertone, chroma and colour season, taken from a white-balanced sample. They are described and used for your palette, not forced into a phototype.
Also searched as Fitzpatrick skin type, skin type test and individual typology angle.
What we report
Skin depth (L*), undertone, chroma and colour season, taken from a white-balanced sample. They are described and used for your palette, not forced into a phototype.
Why not the clinical number itself
ITA requires calibrated CIE L*a*b* colorimetry under a known illuminant. sRGB from a phone under unknown light cannot yield it. Modern computational photography makes it worse: the tone mapping is skin-tone-specific, and it actively destroys colorimetric fidelity. Fitzpatrick is a different thing again. It was designed to predict UV erythema response, not to classify skin colour, and types IV–VI collapse most of the world into three bins.
Sources
- Osto et al. 2022 — ITA and Fitzpatrick are not equivalent — doi.org/10.1111/php.13562
- Almeida et al. 2023 — overview of skin typing scales — doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics10010014
Ratios of near-coplanar frontal distances, angles relative to the interpupillary line, and skin appearance. Each comes with an error bar, and each is placed against a population you choose. Start an analysis or read the methodology.
The others people ask for
Same question, different measurement: what the clinical version needs, and what a photograph can give instead.
What is measured instead
How every bone-level measurement is taken here · methodology · glossary · all 35 insight pages